|
| 贵州农村地区冬季典型燃料产生的室内空气PM2.5和CO排放污染特征研究 |
| Indoor Air Pollution of PM2.5 and CO from Typical Domestic Fuel Combustion in Winter in Rural Areas of Guizhou |
| 投稿时间：2013-01-08 修订日期：2013-06-24 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 贵州农村;室内空气污染;细颗粒物;一氧化碳 |
| 英文关键词: Guizhou rural area;indoor air pollution;fine particle matter;carbon monoxide |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(20967002),贵州省国际科技合作项目黔科合外G字2008-700118,黔科合外G字2010-7038资助。 |
| 作者 | 单位 | E-mail | | 马利英1, 董泽琴1, 吴可嘉2, 潘军1 | 1. 贵州省环境科学研究设计院, 贵阳 550081
2. 上海谱尼测试技术有限公司, 上海 200233 | 471016062@qq.com |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 627 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 贵州冬季阴冷潮湿,农村家庭使用原煤和生物质燃料作为家庭做饭和取暖燃料,室内空气污染对居民健康造成潜在危害。论文选取贵州农村地区冬季典型燃料使用产生的室内空气PM2.5和CO排放为研究对象,研究其排放污染特征,并探讨室内空气CO-PM2.5浓度间的相关性。研究结果表明,不同类型燃料的家庭室内PM2.5浓度水平是燃煤 > 燃柴 > 沼气;厨房浓度高于客厅。燃煤的家庭厨房PM2.5浓度最高,为222.54±41.12 μg/m3,燃柴家庭次之,为130.48±26.53 μg/m3,燃沼气家庭的厨房为74.95±19.20 μg/m3。室内CO浓度较低,不同类型燃料的家庭室内CO浓度水平是燃柴 > 燃煤 > 沼气。燃柴家庭客厅CO浓度最高,为3.16±0.73 mg/m3,其次是燃柴家庭的厨房,为2.76±0.25 mg/m3;燃煤家庭的厨房CO浓度较低,为2.32±0.33 mg/m3;最低为燃沼气家庭的厨房,为0.66±0.07 mg/m3。除沼气村外,燃煤及燃柴家庭室内(厨房和客厅)PM2.5浓度均超过环境空气质量标准(GB3095-2012)PM2.5限值75 μg/m3,室内CO浓度均低于该标准中CO限值10 mg/m3。固体燃料燃烧是贵州农村PM2.5的主要来源,室内PM2.5和CO浓度相关性分析表明二者不具有显著相关性,采用CO监测值来推算PM2.5以提高监测效率的应用可能性受到限制。研究表明,贵州农村地区需采取更加有效的干预措施以减少室内空气污染尤其是控制PM2.5排放。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Solid fuels such as raw coal and biomass were widely used for cooking and heating in the rural areas of Guizhou Province as the weather was cold with high moisture in winter there. In that case, severe indoor air pollution was produced and subsequently presented a threat to human health. In this paper, the spatio-temporal distribution of indoor PM2.5 and CO, and the relationship between the two pollutants were studied. The results showed that coal combustion produced more PM2.5 than biomass and biogas; kitchens had higher PM2.5 concentrations than living rooms. The highest PM2.5 was observed in the coal-use kitchens with a concentration of 222.54±41.12 μg/m3,followed by biomass-use kitchens at 130.48±26.53 μg/m3,and biogas-use kitchens at 74.95±19.20 μg/m3. On the contrary to the high PM2.5 observed, the CO was relatively low. It was found that biomass combustion would generate more CO than coal and biogas. The highest CO was found in the living room of the biomass-use household where the mean value was 3.16±0.73 mg/m3. The CO was low at the kitchen of the coal-use family at 2.32±0.33 mg/m3, with the lowest value to 0.66±0.07mg/m3 at the kitchen of the biogas family. As compared with the Ambient Air Quality GB 3095-2012, PM2.5 in all scenarios except biogas-use group exceeded the safe limit of 75 μg/m3,while CO concentrations in all scenarios were much lower than the limit of 10 mg/m3,indicating that solid fuel combustion was the main source for indoor PM2.5 in the rural areas of Guizhou Province. In addition, it was found that the correlation between indoor PM2.5 and CO concentrations was insignificant, so it is not suitable to use CO as a proxy for PM2.5 monitoring. Interventions for mitigating indoor air pollution, especially for PM2.5 reduction, are still in urgent need for the rural areas of Guizhou Province. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
